A Wise Athlete Sport and education. Both.

Negotiating With a School for Attendance: The First Negotiation With an Institution

U-19 World Cup winning captain Unmukt Chand was denied his Delhi University exam admit card over attendance, and it took the Sports Minister, the HRD Minister and the Vice Chancellor to resolve it. Most cases are smaller, but the negotiation is the same shape.

Most institutional rules are written for the typical case and do not bend on their own. A student-athlete who is repeatedly away for competitions runs into this directly, often for the first time in their life. They meet a rule that exists for good reason, that technically applies to them and that will cause a problem unless someone actively negotiates an exception.

A documented case

Unmukt Chand, who captained India to the 2012 Under-19 Cricket World Cup title, was a first-year student at Delhi University when his cricketing commitments meant he could not meet the university’s minimum attendance requirement of 33.3 percent. He was denied an admit card for his annual examination as a result. This was not resolved by Chand alone. It became a high-level negotiation. Sports Minister Ajay Maken raised the case with Delhi University Vice Chancellor Dinesh Singh, who then asked the Principal of St Stephen’s College to forward the necessary papers. HRD Minister Kapil Sibal separately spoke to both the Vice Chancellor and the Principal, asking whether the Principal could use his discretionary powers to help.

Here, a published, general rule met a deserving exception, and getting that exception required someone to formally ask, document the case and push it through more than one level of an institution. That is a negotiation, not a favour that happened automatically because Chand was famous.

What most student-athletes face

Not every case reaches a minister’s office, and it should not have to. Most schools and colleges that regularly produce competitive athletes already have some internal process for attendance exemptions or make-up arrangements, but that process is rarely automatic. It usually requires:

  • a specific written request
  • supporting proof of the competition (a selection letter, a federation certificate)
  • often, a face-to-face conversation with a teacher or principal who has to be persuaded that the exception is fair to grant

How to Talk to Your School About Your Sport gives scripts for that conversation, and Your Legal Rights as a Student-Athlete in School covers what the rules say. If the school will not move, When Your School Is Not the Right School covers deciding whether to switch or go to NIOS.

The real-world equivalent

This is close to negotiating leave, remote work or a deadline extension with an employer or an institution later in life. There, the answer is not a simple yes stated in a policy document. It is something that has to be actively requested, justified with evidence and followed up on. An athlete who has done this once, even in a smaller and less dramatic way than Chand’s case, already knows that the rule is rarely the end of the conversation. Negotiating Time for Sport Against a Job’s Clock covers that later version, including the options when a sports-quota job is not available.

Do this now

What to do this week

  1. Before the next clash between a competition and an academic requirement, find out in writing what the school or college's actual attendance exemption process is.
  2. Put every request in writing, with supporting proof attached, even if the initial conversation is verbal. Chand's case moved because there were papers to forward.
  3. If a first request is refused, identify the next person in the institution who can actually authorise an exception, the way this case moved from a college principal to a vice chancellor.
Sources (1)Every claim on this page traces back to one of these
  1. Deccan Herald: Delhi VC writes to Ajay Maken on Unmukt Chand's exam attendancedeccanherald.com

Last verified 2026-09-13