Losing in Public and Going Back: What a Prolonged Slump Under Scrutiny Trains
Virat Kohli went 1,020 days without an international century, under constant public scrutiny, before ending it with a 122 he dedicated to the people who stood by him through it. That is a different skill than losing once and recovering.
This platform’s article on losing and coming back covers the internal, psychological mechanism of athletic resilience and how it feeds academic recovery from failure. This article is about something more specific and more public: what it is to fail visibly, for a long time, in front of millions of people who have an opinion about it, and to keep showing up anyway.
An extensively documented case
Virat Kohli went 1,020 days without scoring an international century, from late 2019 into 2022, a period that included open, sustained public and media criticism about his form, his captaincy and, at times, his place in the team. This was not a private slump. It played out across every format he played, in a media environment that discusses an Indian cricketer’s form the way few other professions are discussed in public, day after day, for years.
The drought ended with an unbeaten 122 off 61 balls against Afghanistan at the 2022 Asia Cup, his 71st international century. In his comments afterward, Kohli did not credit a technical fix. He credited the people who had stood by him through the period itself, dedicating the innings to his wife specifically for supporting him “through thick and thin.” The detail worth noticing is what he named as the actual difficulty: not the batting, which he was always capable of, but staying steady through more than two years of a public verdict that he was finished.
What this activity requires
Losing in public over an extended period requires a different kind of endurance than a single defeat. It means continuing to train and prepare the same way regardless of what is being said, not because the criticism is wrong to feel, but because changing the process in response to noise usually makes the slump worse. It also means, as Kohli’s own comments suggest, that getting through it is rarely a purely individual achievement. It depends on who stays close during the two years when the applause has stopped.
The real-world equivalent
Most professionals will, at some point, go through a stretch where their work is publicly or semi-publicly seen as underperforming, whether that is a sales slump, a failed product launch discussed openly at a company or a period of visible struggle in a small, watching professional community. The skill Kohli’s drought illustrates is not talent recovering on its own schedule. It is the discipline of not changing who you are or how you work in response to a temporary, loud, external verdict. The Mental Side of the Dual Journey covers the same separation of identity from result that a bad exam demands.
What to do this week
- During a public or semi-public slump, keep one part of the process completely unchanged on purpose, as a deliberate signal to yourself that the fundamentals have not actually broken.
- Identify, by name, the specific people whose support matters during a difficult public stretch, and let them know directly.
- When the slump ends, notice what changed, technique or patience, and be honest about which one it really was.
Sources (2)Every claim on this page traces back to one of these
- ETV Bharat: Asia Cup 2022, Virat Kohli scores first century since 2019 against Afghanistanetvbharat.com
- Mumbai Indians: Asia Cup 2022, Virat Kohli's 71st international ton powers India to victory over Afghanistanmumbaiindians.com
Last verified 2026-09-13